![]() ![]() If you click on any which entry, you will get some extra information, but you can also use the More info This is also part of the reason why the initial download is so heavy. Superseded patches, and you do not need to worry about them, but the program does not list that anywhere, and ![]() There will still be quite a few old updates, marked in black but not selected. Have installed, so no need to fuss and wonder. Normally, only critical updates are pre-selected, and it will also mark those you already I had a total of 26 updates available for March, which makes sense given the fact I had last updated the HP Once you click the Install Updates section, Autopatcher willĬheck the downloaded data and then load it. This can bleed your bandwidth, but at the very least, it will cache the information,Īfter the process completes, you can move on to the actual installation. The reason is,Īutopatcher will download everything it can find, then only pre-select and offer the KB that have not been This is more than you get if you typically hit the WU check button, however long it takes. NET, Silverlight, Office, and other components separately. Normally, you will only get the standard security and recommended updates. ![]() Select the releases you want, and then click Next. The latter will only work if you have downloaded some updates in the First, you will need to acknowledge the warranty disclaimer and Microsoft EULA. It comes as a zip archive, so you just expand it somewhere there's enough free SuperĪccurate, super safe, and hopefully, fast. Sounds like a cool alternative for WU, but the big question is, does it work safely? Speed may be important, but you want this functionality to be impeccable. It allows you to downloadĬritical security patches, recommended updates, runtime installers, Office, other Windows components, and a few Our first candidate is Autopatcher.Īutopatcher is an offline updater, supporting Windows XP through Windows 8.1. But since I have a test box I can easily afford to sacrifice and lose, I setĪbout exploring, for your sake. Of course, with all the necessary disclaimer, damage and warranty clauses, and the needįor a high level of nerdiness. Really solved the issues of slow Windows Updates - although the recent batch seems to behave with speed andįrugality of resources - I wanted to try several third-party programs, which promise a faster, more System in a fully transparent and safe manner.īut is this really the case? Well, after having encountered and not There's the obvious accountability and supportįactor, but also, especially with Windows, the simple matter of being able to access and use the closed-source With unofficial tools that try to compensate for system issues. If you think the base functionality is lacking, it is still most likely better than tampering Normally, I am the very first person to tell you NOT to use third-party tools for system administration, in any ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |